At the end of the screening I attended, there was long silence. In fact, no one left their seats as the credits rolled. Then a slow dribble of clapping built into a steady rain of applause, followed by a woman in the back proclaiming loudly:
We the People. It’s up to WE THE PEOPLE!
No one responded.
It wasn’t because they didn’t agree or felt the battle was too big. And it wasn’t because they were discouraged. Instead we all were thinking the following three thoughts:
- The end of this country is not only very possible, it’s already begun.
- How could we have been so easily duped?
- It’s time to quit screwing around with minutia and get to work .
For me the scariest revelation was that the film poked holes in my assumption that Barack Obama was only a figurehead of the international union and George Soros cabal. It made me face real, hard evidence that it was Obama himself directing much of our constitutional desecration.
Dinesh D’Souza begins his visually slick film from the unique perspective of sharing more with Obama than most Americans. Not only were they both born and married the same year, they both graduated from Ivy League schools the same year and were educated in former British colonies that had gained independence - D’Souza from India and Obama from Kenya. Like a true scholar or social scientist, Dinesh lays out the theory he will prove. In this case it was:
Barry Soreto – Barack Obama is not a Muslim or a Socialist as much as he is anti-Colonial Collectivist.
The film includes a clip from an appearance D’Souza made on CNN, where he is being attacked for his last book – The Roots of Obama’s Rage. He makes this case:
Islam, or even socialism, doesn’t fit many of the moves Obama has made since becoming President. But anti-colonialism - an intense hatred against Western powers that he believes have “stolen” the resources from third world countries - does. It isn’t so much attempting to help third world countries like Kenya and India to become equal, as it is to penalize and punish Western countries into equality with their financially and militarily inferior sovereignties.
It makes so much sense. I’ve objective to twitter and blog comment descriptions of “Barack the Muslim” since he certainly eats pork, doesn’t have any record of praying seven times a day to Mecca (or excusing himself to do so) and revels in alcohol, bisexuality and other abominations according to the tenants of the Qur'an. Sure, there are hypocritical Muslims, but no high school, college or professional eyewitnesses have confirmed any adherence to Islamic tenants.
Obama however, like D’Souza, had close family members that indoctrinated them with the horrors and injustices of the colonial “occupation” of the British. For Dinesh it was his grandfather and for Obama it was his Barak Obama, Sr. and his mother. We finally learn exactly how flamboyantly radical his father was and, although he only saw him once as a young boy, how psychologically enslaved to the father’s ideals Barack/Barry admits he was in his own biography.
This documentary does a great service to most independents and conservatives since most of us not only haven’t read “Dreams From My Father,” we intentionally prevented the abuse on our gastrointestinal systems by doing so. And in NOT doing our homework, we missed some very important clues that D’Souza uncovers.
We learn that Stanley Ann Dunham divorced second husband Lolo Soreto (Indonesian stepfather to Obama) when he began working for a major oil company and began to fervently embrace pro-Western democracy. Dunham is quoted as saying (in Obama’s Dreams from My Father) that she was betraying “truth” by accepting all the financial security and comforts of her capitalist husband. Although the movie doesn’t say it, this movie brought me to see that Obama’s biography should have read, “Dreams From My Father and Anti-West Screams Of My Mother.” Clearly, it was Stanley Ann that reinforced Obama Senior’s radical revolutionary views upon little Barry until she shipped him off to Hawaii to be raised by his grandmother. (D’Souza also finds that the private school in Hawaii, originally paid for by capitalist sugar plantation owners, actively – and ironically - taught Obama anti-colonial, anti-capitalist resentment as well.)
Another bombshell comes when D’Souza interviews Barack’s famous half brother in Kenya. Unlike his millionaire brother who not only blames Bush and rich people for the problems of America, George Obama doesn’t expect a penny from his brother, the government or anyone else. He espouses a philosophy of self-reliance going so far as to say that Kenya would have been BETTER OFF NOT KICKING OUT THE WHITE PEOPLE. (You heard that right.) Remember, although they shared a father, Stanley Ann Dunham didn’t raise brother George.
He compares South Korea, Singapore and other nations who were actually lagging Kenya in national stature and power but who have far outdistanced themselves as Kenya has gotten caught up into what George Obama calls, “petty rivalries.” Who knew we elected the wrong Kenyan?
Using Obama’s own audio narrative, the film describes Barry/Barack revisiting Kenya upon his father’s death, reconciling his own thoughts and beliefs to that of his radical communist father’s dreams. Barack states that his father’s goals of usurping Western prosperity “are his.” Journalists Aaron Klein and Jerome Corsi have been trying to get our minds around this, but, because we haven’t read the book ourselves, it’s tough to discern. And because of the deceptive “Clintonisms” that Obama uses to conceal the real objectives he is sharing with us, we haven’t wanted to hold the father’s sins against the son. What the film does an exemplary job of, is to lay the genealogical, emotional, experiential and psychological background of Barack into the radical revolutionary collectivism that Obama himself subtly declares in his autobiography.
As Limbaugh says often, these people have to lie and conceal the truth because they know they wouldn’t be elected otherwise. And the somber but determined atmosphere our theater audience experienced was like that of an abused spouse who just now was seeing how they missed so many obvious clues before getting in bed with a sociopath. But Americans aren’t victims, so while it takes a moment to process (and we aren’t given to explosive and erratic revenge), we slowly meditate on what this means as we knit the bullwhip together we will use to kick the money changers from our temple of liberty.
And just as we were shocked to learn that in America, our culture has so deteriorated that multiple young women teachers have turned to pedophilia with our children, we realize that an entire generation has already been raped by similar public school lessons in history books we taxpayers have paid for. Who would think an impoverished Kenyan would be better educated on what made this country great than our own American students?
Dinesh contrasts the philosophies of an education that drums a “guilt” complex into students versus one that focuses on improving toward an ideal, because of the blessings our Judeo-Christian Republicanism as afforded us. He recounts a debate at Stanford University he had with Jesse Jackson Jr. When asked to give an example of racism today in America that would stop any person of color from achieving the American dream, the Reverend Jackson couldn’t name any, except to say that it had gone “underground” and was worse because we couldn’t see what we were fighting. In other words, “beware of the boogeyman for which there is no evidence.” What is even more shocking is that aside from this single university debate, there are entire bachelor degrees to be earned at most major colleges teaching even more radically insane views as “truth.” And these graduates go on to become teachers in public and private schools further perpetuating the decay.
Frank Marshall Davis
Besides his mother, we should be astounded at the influence of the educators in Obama’s life. Not just by the overwhelming numbers of radicals that he spent time with – but with the amount of time he spent with them. Not just a few “friends of the family” or a few professors, but the “who’s who” of radical revolutionary thinkers in modern times. We learn in the film that Frank Marshal Davis was so radical and such a communist revolutionary, that our government had decided to arrest him should we enter a war with the Soviet Union. And for EIGHT formative years in grade school and high school, he was Obama’s surrogate father. This is a man who was literally a card carrying member of the Communist Party – Card number: 47544.
One such view Davis espoused will chill you (h/t Daily Caller):
“the goal was not for business or Wall Street or individual businessmen and corporations to stimulate the economy, but for ‘taxes’ to be redistributed by the federal government.”
Davis wrote that “tax money should flow into shovel-ready ‘public works projects’ and be redirected and redistributed into ‘increased social security benefits, health insurance, education and low cost housing.’” This, Kengor writes, along with Davis’ suggestion of “using tax money for ‘health insurance,”
Here is an excerpt from the film that will stun you. (h/t The Blaze)
Dinesh D’Souza ends the film describing how Obama has implemented this anti-colonial policy by using debt as a weapon of internal mass destruction. It isn’t a political laziness or deception that directs Obama to not demand a budget from the Senate in three years. THE GOAL is to keep using American credit until the world rips up our credit card and repossess our goods. Many of us have already heard that Obama has run up more dept in 3 years than all the presidents from George Washington to George Bush 41 have combined.
Many of us who discounted the “Muslim” angle focused on the Marxist definition. That is closer but still doesn’t touch the D’Souza’s epiphany. Many Marxists are motivated by a displaced desire to empower the people by spreading the wealth. Obama certainly has said and attempted this by creating the biggest tax in US history, advocating more taxes on the rich and by literally recruiting people to be enslaved by food stamps and government reparations to black farmers. But through this film, we now see his motivation has nothing to do with helping the underprivileged as demonstrated by his lack of concern for his half brother.
Obama’s real goal is to enact revenge on Britain and America for his perception of their parasitic abuse of power – that they took resources from poor countries to make money for themselves.
An intense desire to strip America of her power, militarily and economically, DOES fit everything from the arrogance of sending Queen Elizabeth an IPod filled with his speeches and returning the bust of premier Colonist Winston Churchill; to directing the State Department to reduce our nuclear arsenal from 5,000 to 1,500 to 300. With so many other scandals and assaults on sovereignty in the news, this unilateral disarmament gets lost despite the enormous consequence of removing the United State’s role as a military superpower within the next few years. (Below is not the graphic from the movie but approximates Obama’s America revelation that the US will not only soon be outnumbered in nukes by anti-West countries, but even lowly Pakistan.)
With a couple of hundred mouths hanging open in our dark theater with thunderstorms booming throughout the film, the audience and I were moving from severe shock, to calculating what this meant in the upcoming election. Those who thought it was ridiculous to think Obama had such sinister intentions on health care in 2008 were sobered when long standing House rules were simply tossed aside to manipulate the legislation system to have their way. It should have warned us further the extent that Barack Obama would go to upend the notion of representative government in any way he can. Any normal American – even most Democrats like Bill Clinton – wouldn’t have dared to disregard the symbolic importance of the Congress reflecting the collective view of the American people by forcing an unpopular bill through – much less shift in how America runs in historic proportions. But for Obama, there seems no rule he is unwilling to break although he will try to bend it as deceitfully as possible first.
Like me, the couple I was with, became more convinced that as a revolutionary anti-colonialist, we can’t afford to assume that Barack Obama would even abide by the results of the election, much less take whatever actions he needed to accomplish his destructive mission. Hasn’t he proven that both in evidence of his personal criminality as well as public misuse of authority?
The co-director, John Sullivan who directed Ben Stein’s EXPELLED documentary, has done a fantastic job of using the most modern post-MTV visual and audio filmmaking techniques to remove one more objection from the liberals arsenal of likely attacks on the film. It can be a bit overpowering for an older generation not use to Michael Bay-like music video vibes, but D’Souza’s calm voice and steady pacing make you shout for joy that “our side” has finally come of age using media.
Many will be a little discouraged that Obama’s America takes his undocumented birth at Kapi’olani Medical Center as gospel just based on two newspaper clippings. The film doesn’t point out that neither actually name the hospital or any important criteria. It has proven beyond any doubt that both papers received their information from a single source, and that many foreign born children were also announced in these papers. It also doesn’t reconcile all of the evidence that Obama may have had a different father. But I’m grateful the film did not get into this. This movie is about Obama’s development AFTER he was born (wherever, whenever and to whoever that was) and what belief system fits his words and actions of his past and present. The media would have focused only on these controversies had they been left in and it would have successfully deflected the more damning accusations of who Obama is now.
The film also frames the economic debate as George Washington through Bill Clinton, versus BOTH Obama and “W.” It throws George W. Bush (rightfully) under the famous pickup truck that Obama said was headed into the ditch under 43. Liberals will never understand how the Tea Party doesn’t hate Bush, but still holds him just as accountable for this present mess. Again this completely takes away another “Republican versus Democrat” argument and force a focus on Obama’s philosophy while making the film seem honest in laying proper responsibility where it should.
From the viewpoint of a scholar, patriot, independent, conservative or aesthetic-focused filmmaker, this film does EVERYTHING right. It is for that reason why I make the claim that this picture has an opportunity to change this election. Frankly it all comes down to distribution. And it is why, if you love this country, you can NOT just accept a couple of clips on this site and a few reviews and forgo the experience yourself. In Hollywood and media, box office equals votes and media attention. The abhorrent and raunchy “Ted” is repeated in popular culture because of its’ success of people who share the sordid experience. The amazing “For Greater Glory” about fascist government oppression of religion, made a mere blip on just conservative radar and didn’t change the discourse in any great way at all. It is absolutely critical for you buy a ticket to this movie when it plays near you, even if you give it away or go see Ice Age 45. If you are a Tea Party or can get a couple of hundred people, you can book a theater yourself.
I pray the distributors have the foresight to release this to Video on Demand and DVD immediately regardless of theatrical distribution possibilities. It is the kind of movie you could safely give to any family, friend or co-worker without being embarrassed about how you will be perceived since it is a quality documentary and it stays completely in the center of objective fact.
I had one final thought on the film. Besides helping us to finally understand what we are dealing with, in the psychology of Obama, it may also serve to remove one less reading requirement for high school. There is probably no longer the need to read George Orwell’s 1984, if you’ve lived through Barack Obama’s 2012. Or if by seeing this film, you finally understand how sinister his intentions have been all along and how well he has hidden it.
As D’Souza closes his film an interviewee exhorts that the solution lies exactly in the power of “We the People,” as our forefathers designed. It is OUR responsibility to inform those beyond our conservative clique and our responsibility to ensure that we do the dirty work of holding politicians accountable. It starts with voting, and ensuring an accurate vote. It also means we can no longer afford the luxury of just sitting back and complaining how terrible the loss of our freedom is, without actually DOING something about it. So get to it.
UPDATE: Superb investigative reporter Aaron Klein is releasing a book in August exposing what Obama has planned for a second term. I had to append this post with an excerpt from a WND article on this.
The book is based on exhaustive research into Obama’s upcoming detailed presidential plans and policies, as well as the specific second-term recommendations of major “progressive” groups behind Obama and the Democratic leadership – the organizations that help craft legislation and set the political and rhetorical agenda for the president and his allies.
Here are a few highlights of dozens and dozens of second term plans uncovered in “Fool Me Twice”:
- An expansive, de facto amnesty program for illegal aliens via executive order and interagency directives linked with a reduction in the capabilities of the U.S. Border Patrol and plans to bring in untold numbers of new immigrants with the removal of caps on H-1B visas and green cards.
- Government-funded, neighborhood-based programs to better integrate the newly amnestied immigrants into society, including education centers and healthcare centers. A “federal solution” to ensure that the amnestied immigrants are treated “equitably” across the United States.
- The recreation of a 21st century version of FDR’s Works Progress Administration program within the Department of Labor that would oversee a massive new bureaucracy and millions of new federal jobs;
- Specific plans for a National Infrastructure Bank. This entity would “evaluate and finance infrastructure projects ‘of substantial regional and national importance” and would finance “transportation infrastructure, housing, energy, telecommunications, drinking water, wastewater, and other infrastructures.”
- Wresting control of the military budget from Congress by attempting to place an ”independent panel” in charge of military spending while slashing the defense budget in shocking ways.
- The vastly reduced resources of the U.S. Armed Forces will be spread even thinner by using them to combat “global warming,” fight global poverty, remedy “injustice,” bolster the United Nations and step up use of “peacekeeping” deployments;
